A&S Research
253 Lombard Street, Suite B
Thousand Oaks, California 91360
805-495-2613
Overview
This organization,
working together with scientific groups such as N.I.D.S. and other
scientists worldwide has set forth to compile and analyze physical evidence
relating to
various areas of Phenomenology. In the course of doing so, we were exposed to
the
aforementioned case approximately eight years ago. A& S Research has determined
that
this case represents the greatest abundance of physical evidence of any like
case on record.
Example of physical
evidence yet to undergo examination:
1. Anomalous magnetic or electromagnetic phenomena involving the encounter site.
2. Soil taken from the front yard involving landing traces.
3. Powdery substances covering a wristwatch.
4. Samples of fluorescence taken from the walls of the closet and bedroom.
5. Footprint castings.
6. Anomalous video footage.
Future studies
involve:
1. Wound analysis of body marks as well as physiological testing and blood analysis.
2. Analysis of the ambient background involving temperature fluctuations,
-- electromagnetic anomalies, and light and sound
affects.
3. Infared photography.
In actuality, the
"Claw" is only one portion of this totality currently under investigation.
The "Claw" was given priority becaause of the importance of possibly
finding nonterrestial
DNA. It is the opinion of A& S Research that the results of this most comprehensive
DNA investigation does not contribute to either the strength or weakness of
possible
extraterrestrial involvement in the case. It is also our opinion this intensive
and expensive
scientific investigation serve as an example of how academic science can be
mated with
Phenomenology to produce clear cut acceptable results. These results can then
be
subjected to the normal peer review processes with publication in scientific
literature. It
should also serve to illustrate why the current standard of research in numerous
areas of
Phenomenology lacks veracity and acceptance. What good does it do to make claims
based on opinion and then publicize them through the media to the general public
without
subjecting these claims to scientific methodology? We believe this to be foolish
and
serving to no one.