Log in

For those doubting the validity of this sighting we refer you to the website realufos.net and the analysis footage conducted by the National Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey (TUBITAK) 

“TUBITAK, as a result of the thorough analysis it conducted it prepared an official report that stated: “The objects sighted in the aforementioned footage that have a structure that is made of specific material are definitely not made up by any kind of computer animation nor are they any form of special effects used for simulation in a studio or for a video effect therefore in conclusion it was decided that the sightings were neither a mockup or hoax. “Furthermore in the last part of the report, it was concluded that these objects in the sightings that have physical and material structures do not belong in any category ( such as; planes, helicopters, meteors, Venus, Mars, satellites, fire balls”,

13 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Jacquie B

    I heard that Dr Leir actually stood behind the filmographer of this video. I was hoping to hear what he had to say about this.

    December 3, 2010 at 3:04 am
  2. scolbern

    Yes, I was there and was as flabbergasted as were all the others that saw it through the camera. The Aliens were much more clear than even the video demonstrated. It was if they knew we were filming them.

    Dr. Leir

    December 4, 2010 at 9:18 pm
  3. KnowSys

    I`m surprised that the media in Turkey reported that sighteeing,but the rest of the world knows nothing about this. I never thought, that the media was taking money for covering up blockbusting news. Somebody must spend a lot of money to keep the rest of the world unknowing.

    January 27, 2011 at 11:44 am
  4. Istanbul und Türkei Community

    Huhu,

    vielen Dank für den lesenswerten Artikel. Warum entdecke ich diesen Blog erst jetzt? Schaue ab jetzt aber häufiger vorbei. Also ran an die Federn :p

    Viele Grüße aus Bonn; dein Pharmaziestudent :)

    September 3, 2011 at 1:25 pm
  5. Robert

    Mr. Leir, I was half skeptic half interested in your works. But with this testimony and other “holes” in your implant studies… I must say that I am very disappointed.

    Here is a very good investigation on that case :
    http://www.alcione.org/FRAUDES/00TURQUIA/

    Why misquoting the TUBITAK?

    February 9, 2012 at 9:15 am
  6. scolbern

    It’s Dr. Leir to you! Please get your facts and titles straight. There are no “holes” in our implant studies; all the material that we place on this site was either witnessed and verified by us, personally, or comes from sources we consider reliable.
    Dr. Leir witnessed that very spectacular UFO sighting in Turkey, as have many other people in that area (the UFO activity is ongoing). It was not hoaxed, and I resent your implication that Jaime Mausson and Haktan Akdogan are “hoaxers”. I know both of them personally, and would vouch for their character and integrity anytime.
    It is typical of small-minded, armchair, critics like yourself to get your information from blatant debunking pieces like this. This article obviously came either from other armchair types, like you, or from some govt propaganda office.
    Why don’t you work your brain a little more, and your mouth and keyboard a little less? Better yet, why don’t you get out of your overstuffed armchair, and get out to Turkey to check things out for yourself! It would be good for you to do a little REAL investigation, for a change.
    If you have legitimate questions about our research, please present them here, in your own words, without referring to debunker articles, and we will answer them.

    February 9, 2012 at 11:39 am
  7. Pegasus

    @alienscalpel

    Would you agree that in some of the footage the reflected moonlight suggests a curved prominence at the apex of the crafts leading edge?

    I’d would also like to know if any UFO researchers believe this/these craft to be the same type of craft as those witnessed by Kenneth Arnold in 1947.

    tia

    April 17, 2012 at 1:03 pm
  8. scolbern

    Yes, it did look to me like there may have been a structure like that present. The craft pictured is the same general shape as the ones reported by Kenneth Arnold, but is probably significantly larger.

    April 19, 2012 at 11:51 am
  9. Pegasus

    Hi,thanks for your reply.

    Why is it probably significantly larger?

    Didn’t Arnold see two types of craft, one which he described as “spade-like” and the other as “cresent shaped”, “like a bat’s wing” or “something like a pie plate that was cut in half with a sort of a convex triangle in the rear”

    To my eye, it looks like there are two different types of craft in the Kumburgaz film.

    The craft in the footage where one occupant can be seen seems to come to a point. Whereas the footage with two beings seems to have the begins of a nose cone.

    Although Kenneth Arnold makes no mention of a nose cone on the “cresent shaped” I suspect there was one, because I witnessed a fleet of what I believe to be the same craft in a different guise fifteen years ago. They looked like this http://imgur.com/7mkIa

    I won’t recount the entire event, just what’s relevant.

    When the craft flew in a V formation (same as the Lubbock lights) they were propelled continously and when they flew in an undulating, snakelike formation they were being propelled in pulses, now had I been at the same altitude as them rather than beneath their flight path would it be reasonable to assume that they would of looked like “saucers skipping on water”.

    I believe I know why they fly in these changing formations, in part at least.

    April 23, 2012 at 11:08 pm
  10. scolbern

    Sure. It was just my impression that the craft Arnold saw were somewhat smaller, although there is no good way to judge size, without film footage of the event. I never heard that Arnold saw two types of craft; I just read about him seeing the crescent-shaped variety.
    Yes, I think it is possible that the Kumburgaz videos show two slightly different types of craft; either that, or that model of UFO can change shape, or “morph”, as we have seen some smaller UFO types do in videos.
    Please tell us about your hypothesis as to why the craft you and Kenneth Arnold saw flew in an undulating manner? We look forward to hearing from you again.

    April 24, 2012 at 11:58 am
  11. Pegasus

    To be clear, the craft undulate in two planes.The individual craft would gain and lose altitude as Arnold witnessed,due to being propelled in pulses.

    When I witnessed the craft from beneath the whole formation undulated. It looked similar to a sidewinder going across a desert.

    There were three leading craft. The craft to the right of each leader became the next leading craft and so on, it looked like a three peaked wave moving across the formation.They were propelled in pulses whilst flying in this formation and continuously when tranaforming to a two rowed chevron.
    http://i.imgur.com/2aGzv.jpg

    As I watch them it became obvious that they were being controlled as one thing. There was some sort of telemetry going on, one craft must of been controlling the others or each craft knew where the others were and what they were going to do next, I described it as “some kind of collective autopilot” when I reported it two days after the event.

    I think they were conserving and equalizing energy consumption, by fly in lead crafts wake to reduce drag and constantly changing the leader to share the burden of cutting through the atmosphere, like geese do when in a skein but in a controlled and measured way. It may also have been a defensive ploy, making it more difficult for any potential attacker to shoot them down.

    If I hadn’t of seen it I never would of thought of it, I’m a builder’s labourer not a flight systems designer.

    I also wonder if what I saw could be at the root of many legends of mythical creatures if it had been seen in ancient times. Parhaps undulating formation was interpreted as a fire,flame,worm or a snake. The chevron may of been seen as wings,horns or a bird. The ancients may of mistook the individual craft for scales,shields or hooves if they had seen them, which is something we will never know.

    April 25, 2012 at 12:10 am
  12. A beliver & Witness To A Similar Craft

    I saw a craft,very similar to this in every way, on the evening of 8-9-08; the sun was still out. My sighting was credible enough to have a MUFON Official visit my home. I was also a guest on the Jeff Rense show twice. What I saw was VERY REAL,shocking,and awesome. Hovering,heavy,silent,still,and reflecting the sunset. No visible lights (sunny) and I know characteristics of any known earthly craft. Could it be the same one?

    July 2, 2012 at 2:09 pm
  13. stephen a

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news,,,but this video on this page does not work,,,interesting, but thanks to youtube, I am amazed by the quality and work put into analyzing this video. Roger Leir is definitely going into the history books for this sighting….Grade AAA if you ask me.

    April 3, 2013 at 9:22 pm

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.